Page 9 of 14

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:46 pm
by Tom
Oh yes it is on the list :)

The house building is taking a few months longer than expected :-(

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:34 pm
by kempo
Nobody else is flying ? :)

Image

Image

[3D model done using Recap360]

Pictures done at 3 weeeks difference:

Image

Image

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:55 am
by Tom
Cool! Could you share your experience about tooling?

I used to use Globalmapper (I think this is the name) for viewing the 3D model (from PIX4D) but it was not good and slow to view the huge 3D model (~1GB)

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:56 pm
by kempo
Tom wrote:Cool! Could you share your experience about tooling?

I used to use Globalmapper (I think this is the name) for viewing the 3D model (from PIX4D) but it was not good and slow to view the huge 3D model (~1GB)


Tom, to stitch the images for 2D result i'm, using Microsoft ICE. For 3D map i'm using Recap360 :
https://recap360.autodesk.com/Signin.aspx. Not the best results but the software are free.

Now i'm building a FX-61 wing, I hope that I will have better results in terms of area covered, picture quality.

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:32 am
by kempo
Hi Tom,

I have done multiple flights this week and I have some ideea to improve the Z-type flightplan.

Now the flightplan looks like this:

Image

As you can observe at the middle of the flightplan we have more lines than needed- this means more battery consumed.

My proposal is to have a flightplan like this (not to double the lines inside of the flightplan):

Image

Also , during the flightplan creation I have observed that at the "begining" of the flight plan (black arrow marked on the image) we are not covering very well the area, the line that should be exactly on the red square is missing but for the "ending" of the flightplan (red arrow) we have more fligh lines than needed - battery consumption not justified.

Image

Thank you,
Alex

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:56 pm
by kempo
New version of the manual :

http://www.myap.ro/wp-content/uploads/2 ... -v1.31.pdf

Any ideea of improvement, observation is welcomed.

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:34 pm
by kempo
Good evening,

I have upgraded to firmware version 10.5 ,my first observation is that is a big improvement in terms of flightplan ( better coverage of the survey area). Even so it seems that is a small issue, after "Build route" the waypoints are not visible...It will apppear only after playing with one of them , please check the video below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BW8THt9 ... KZ_4qZcxPQ

Tom, is this a software bug ? Can be fixed ? From my point of view waypoint 3 in example above is useless.

Also the ground station window "name" is 0.10 Beta 4 even if the software is Beta 5.

Thank you.

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:45 pm
by Tom
Thanks for letting me know!
There is a new version available: BETA5b :-)
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing

Tom

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:54 am
by kempo
Tom[/quote]

Tom, Thank you!

What is preparing Santa Claus for Gluonpilot users :) ?

Hardware / software updates ?( length/width of the survey area, area covered by the survey, theoretical length of the flight lines..).

Thank you.

Re: Photogrammetry with gluonpilot

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 12:02 pm
by kempo
Hello all,

During last days the time allow me to try the improved Z-type survey. Below you can see 2 flights done :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2lwLoh ... KZ_4qZcxPQ

Tom, please tell me that there is a work in progress in order to add the theoretical area of the survey flightplan ( L x l).

Image

Happy holidays!